- FXA (corresponding to Australian Dollar money market fund).
- FXE (corresponding to a Euro money market fund)
- FXF (corresponding to a Swiss Franc money market fund)
- GLD (corresponding to physical gold)
- SPY (corresponding to the S&P 500 with dividends reinvested)
- IWM (corresponding to the Russell 2000 with dividends reinvested)
You will note that over the last five years, the S&P 500 barely holds its own even in using the BLS numbers, while the Russell 2000 beats them only modestly. If you use the "Alternative" deflator, you will find that the US equities markets perform rather pathetically, gold has performaed quite well,which could mean one of at least three things:
- Gold is overvalued
- Inflation is expected to pick up even more
- Our time series does not go back far enough, and gold had been somewhat undervalued before 2006
The next chart summarizes what I had just said above, by expressing returns in alternative constant dollars (where the thicker lines are the S&P 500 and the Russell 2000):
Finally, everyone wants to know how the other (antipodal) half lives, and now we express our cost of living and returns of financial instruments in terms of the Australian Dollar:
The thick light blue line is the (alternative) CPI. Apparently, an Australian saw the price of gold peak back in late 2008, and it has been fairly constant later. The Australian who travels to the US frequently has apparently found that it has not gotten more costly over the last five years, and, if he is wise, he would not have invested in the US equities markets (which would have lost him 20% of his money). More interestingly, neither would he have invested in the Australian Equities market (dark blue thick line -- the MSCI Australia index, with dividends reinvested, as represented by the EWA ETF), which, while outperforming the US markets, did worse than keeping the Ozzies in a money market fund. Strange, but, seemingly, true.
No comments:
Post a Comment